{ "version": "research-homepage-v2", "editorial_date": "October 2026", "catalog": { "snapshot": "2026-09-14", "input_jsonl_files": 238, "input_rows": 528093, "exact_unique_records": 303951, "duplicate_occurrences": 224142, "inventory_files": 11901, "coverage_note": "All local raw/canonical/prepared files inventoried. Every nonblank canonical/prepared JSONL row indexed. Exact identical records share locations; distinct views and related events still overlap.", "publication_note": "Public metadata, factual values and project-authored summaries. Third-party full text stays in research copies; original publishers retain attribution. Full-record local mode uses indexed file offsets." }, "record_examples": [ { "type": "Press-conference Q&A", "scope": "Public metadata projection", "record": { "id": "mfa:t20240530_11347302:qa:0", "country_iso3": "CHN", "represented_entity": "China", "institution": "foreign_ministry", "speaking_capacity": "spokesperson", "speaker": "Wang Wenbin", "event_date": "2022-06-14", "date_precision": "day", "available_date": "2022-06-14", "group_id": "mfa:conference:2022-06-14", "document_symbols": [], "source_url": "https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202405/t20240530_11347302.html", "quality_flags": [], "split": "unassigned", "review_status": "pending" }, "pointer": { "id": "mfa:t20240530_11347302:qa:0", "uid": "8ffa0b1929309fa9f7882192e7231d00685aba1a0251fe76cff232de6532befd", "title": "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on June 14, 2022", "date": "2022-06-14", "source_url": "https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202405/t20240530_11347302.html", "file": "data/canonical/mfa.jsonl", "line": 9984, "task": "authentic_qa", "fields": [ "available_date", "context", "country_iso3", "country_name", "date_precision", "derivation", "document_symbols", "event_date", "group_id", "history", "id", "institution", "language", "parent_id", "quality_flags", "quality_status", "question", "raw_file", "raw_sha256", "represented_entity", "review_status", "rights_status", "schema_version", "source_id", "source_record_id", "source_url", "speaker", "speaking_capacity", "split", "task", "text", "title", "topic_method", "topics" ], "quality_flags": [], "rights_status": "unresolved", "review_status": "pending", "split": "unassigned" } }, { "type": "Diplomatic statement", "scope": "Exact statement from the published sample viewer", "record": { "id": "climate-fra", "country": "FRA", "source_id": "record-8923", "symbol": "S/PV.8923", "statement_date": "2021-12-09", "source_role": "prior_public_statement", "pdf_sha256": "7714d361642b047e184a06cd742bcc9ec896565c7d2e06902a06863e398bd31d", "source_url": "https://documents.un.org/api/symbol/access?l=en&s=S%2FPV.8923&t=pdf", "document_text_digest": "d3f6a05e4f0b21d4129ef7daf84dd5a9a17e917114c909fd32bd6af9cf50c594", "document_start": 50564, "document_end": 54872, "locations": [ { "page": 12, "column": "right", "document_start": 50564, "document_end": 52233 }, { "page": 13, "column": "left", "document_start": 52235, "document_end": 54704 }, { "page": 13, "column": "right", "document_start": 54706, "document_end": 54872 } ], "text": "Mr. De Rivière (France) (spoke in French): At the outset, I would like to commend the Niger for its unswerving commitment to the fight against climate change and for organizing this debate. This debate provides another opportunity to emphasize that this is environmental fight is also a fight for international peace and security. That is why it is appropriate for the Security Council to address the threats linked to climate change. I welcome the Secretary-General to today’s meeting and thank Mr. Faki Mahamat and Mr. Nuhu for their briefings. Because our world is facing a climate emergency, it is also in permanent danger and is exposed to increased security risks and new threats. The links between climate and security have been firmly established for a long time. We can confirm that everywhere — in the Horn of Africa, in the Sahel and in the Middle East. Desertification, reduced access to water and broader issues related to access to natural resources in rural areas, food shortages and climate insecurity are all factors that allow armed extremist groups to grow by exploiting people’s frustration. We know that in the Sahel terrorist groups exploit inter-ethnic and community conflicts, as well as economic conflicts between farmers and herders, in a context where climate change has significantly changed agropastoral systems. We must do all we can to prevent terrorist groups from taking advantage of the distress caused by the effects of climate change, land degradation and the loss of biodiversity in areas already marked by tensions and fragility. That obviously requires better allocation of natural resources. That is an absolute necessity because\n\nwe must not leave the field open for terrorist groups to exploit these conflicts. Furthermore, where there are serious security threats, we must build a virtuous circle between sustainable development and action to preserve the climate. That is the purpose of the Great Green Wall project in the Sahel, a flagship programme to combat the effects of climate change, desertification, food insecurity and poverty from Senegal to Djibouti. The sum of $19 billion has been earmarked for the project, which should make it possible to restore 250 million hectares of degraded land by 2030, create 10 million jobs and capture 250 million tons of carbon. We must also assist regional and subregional organizations and initiatives, in particular those of the Group of Five for the Sahel (G-5 Sahel). Supporting the G-5 Sahel means providing its Joint Force with the predictable and sustainable logistical and financial support it needs from the United Nations, as well as responding to the essential issues of development and combating climate change that the region faces. The Security Council must be able to anticipate, prevent and seek solutions to counter the effects of climate change, in particular for the most vulnerable populations. The Council’s unity and spirit of compromise are essential in the face of such a challenge. Climate change is a major test for multilateralism. Only coordinated action by all actors, in particular the United Nations, can lead us in the right direction. The Council must therefore be able to better assess and address the impact of climate change on international peace and security and to draw all the necessary conclusions, region by region and subject by subject, for the issues on its agenda. To do that, we cannot rely solely on the commitment of the armed forces and peacekeepers deployed in the peacekeeping operations. In that regard, I would like to commend once again their commitment and sacrifice. To build long-term responses, we also need a way to better understand how climate change and crises are linked and how they reinforce each other so that we may strengthen the resilience of States and their populations. Lastly, as the twenty-sixth Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ended a few days ago in Glasgow, we must remember that the cost of inaction would be immense for any of us. That is why France calls on each State to make firm and lasting commitments to reduce\n\ngreenhouse-gas emissions in line with the challenges facing our planet. The international community can count on France’s full and complete commitment in that regard.", "text_digest": "8a81bf2d53146fd711de10e6dc7f2c71ccf1d894ed2ed9a9f0f5d4d91e37f179", "publication_before_vote_verified": false, "review_status": "assistant_source_checked; independent_review_pending" } }, { "type": "Policy evidence", "scope": "Public metadata projection", "record": { "id": "uk_desnz:GBR-ndc-2035-government-en:span:0:225", "country_iso3": "GBR", "represented_entity": "United Kingdom", "event_date": "2025-01-30", "available_date": null, "group_id": "ndc:uk_2035", "source_url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/679b655f6bb4c44f0805e7bc/uk-2035-nationally-determined-contribution-large-print.pdf", "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "review_status": "pending" }, "pointer": { "id": "uk_desnz:GBR-ndc-2035-government-en:span:0:225", "uid": "4ad155adf90bebe2b27ea96d225acf47f3efc7cf424ab7c0c1b30e2e19b10ed8", "title": "uk_desnz:GBR-ndc-2035-government-en:span:0:225", "date": "2025-01-30", "source_url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/679b655f6bb4c44f0805e7bc/uk-2035-nationally-determined-contribution-large-print.pdf", "file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/evidence-passages.jsonl", "line": 842, "task": "policy_evidence", "fields": [ "available_date", "country_iso3", "document_type", "end_char", "event_date", "group_id", "id", "language", "parent_id", "pdf_page", "proposed_split", "raw_sha256", "related_countries", "represented_entity", "review_status", "source_id", "source_url", "split", "split_group", "start_char", "text", "training_admitted", "use" ], "quality_flags": [], "rights_status": "not_recorded", "review_status": "pending", "split": "quarantine" } }, { "type": "Human-rights recommendation", "scope": "Public metadata projection", "record": { "id": "uhri:000720fc-7559-4986-b389-173577457a44", "country_iso3": "IND", "represented_entity": "India", "institution": "UN_Human_Rights_Council_UPR", "speaking_capacity": "recommending_state", "event_date": "2017-07-11", "date_precision": "day", "available_date": "2019-04-11", "group_id": "uhri:document:9de4c918-69b5-4d2b-9a52-fb8d713033ad", "document_symbols": [ "A/HRC/39/14" ], "source_url": "https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/our-data-api", "quality_flags": [ "document_date_not_review_date", "recommendation_context_missing" ], "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "review_status": "pending", "recommending_states": [ "India" ], "reviewed_states": [ "Azerbaijan" ], "upr_cycle": "- Cycle 3" }, "pointer": { "id": "uhri:000720fc-7559-4986-b389-173577457a44", "uid": "62bea4f673afed0761e4422fe2ca3d1469aa2a203e2a086ad82753258753d2dc", "title": "A/HRC/39/14", "date": "2017-07-11", "source_url": "https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/our-data-api", "file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/uhri-records.jsonl", "line": 12023, "task": "upr_recommendation", "fields": [ "affected_persons", "annotation_type", "available_date", "context", "country_iso3", "country_name", "date_precision", "derivation", "document_symbols", "event_date", "existing_event_splits", "fresh_evaluation_eligible", "fresh_evaluation_note", "group_id", "history", "id", "institution", "language", "mechanism", "proposed_split", "quality_flags", "quality_status", "question", "raw_file", "raw_sha256", "recommending_states", "represented_entity", "response_labels", "review_status", "reviewed_states", "rights_status", "schema_version", "sdgs", "source_id", "source_record_id", "source_url", "speaking_capacity", "split", "split_group", "task", "text", "title", "topic_method", "topics", "training_admitted", "upr_cycle", "upr_session" ], "quality_flags": [ "document_date_not_review_date", "recommendation_context_missing" ], "rights_status": "unresolved", "review_status": "pending", "split": "quarantine" } }, { "type": "Vote record", "scope": "Public metadata projection", "record": { "id": "unga_dm:A/1081-S0100:140", "country_iso3": "BRA", "represented_entity": "Brazil", "institution": "UNGA", "speaking_capacity": "voting_member", "event_date": "1949-11-25", "date_precision": "day", "available_date": null, "group_id": "unga:decision:A/1081-S0100", "document_symbols": [ "A/PV.256", "A/1081", "rejected" ], "source_url": "https://unvotes.unige.ch/", "quality_flags": [ "proposal_text_missing" ], "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "review_status": "pending" }, "pointer": { "id": "unga_dm:A/1081-S0100:140", "uid": "492d45b4d2baf4d18c5a1fb50fc30e43b269feb09e6d027fcde11c905f0009f1", "title": "A/1081-S0100", "date": "1949-11-25", "source_url": "https://unvotes.unige.ch/", "file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/unga-votes.jsonl", "line": 27833, "task": "vote_label_only", "fields": [ "amended_vote", "available_date", "context", "country_iso3", "country_name", "current_seat_name", "date_precision", "decision_mode", "decision_topic", "derivation", "document_symbols", "draft_resolution_id", "event_date", "existing_event_splits", "fresh_evaluation_eligible", "fresh_evaluation_note", "group_id", "history", "id", "institution", "language", "meeting_record_id", "member_state_id", "original_seat_name", "original_vote", "proposed_split", "quality_flags", "quality_status", "question", "raw_file", "raw_sha256", "represented_entity", "resolution_id", "review_status", "rights_status", "schema_version", "session_id", "source_id", "source_record_id", "source_url", "speaking_capacity", "split", "split_group", "task", "text", "title", "topic_method", "topics", "training_admitted", "vote_was_amended" ], "quality_flags": [ "proposal_text_missing" ], "rights_status": "unresolved", "review_status": "pending", "split": "quarantine" } }, { "type": "Country statistic", "scope": "Public metadata projection", "record": { "id": "WDI-FRA-NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS-2024", "country_iso3": "FRA", "source_url": "https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/bra;chn;deu;fra;gbr;ind/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL;NY.GDP.MKTP.CD;NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS?source=2&date=2024&format=json&per_page=1000", "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "review_status": "author_checked_independent_review_pending" }, "pointer": { "id": "WDI-FRA-NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS-2024", "uid": "bc404abf24f9168b91d1165c39e17a30f4ebb153bb94a588a6eb324f482663ea", "title": "Trade (% of GDP)", "date": "2024", "source_url": "https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/bra;chn;deu;fra;gbr;ind/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL;NY.GDP.MKTP.CD;NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS?source=2&date=2024&format=json&per_page=1000", "file": "data/prepared/country-knowledge-20260914/facts.jsonl", "line": 16, "task": "country_statistics", "fields": [ "available_at_reference_year", "country_iso3", "database_last_updated", "definition", "fresh_evaluation_eligible", "id", "indicator", "label", "missing", "record_type", "reference_year", "retrieved_at", "review_status", "source_id", "source_pointer", "source_url", "split", "training_admitted", "unit", "upstream_organization", "use", "value" ], "quality_flags": [], "rights_status": "not_recorded", "review_status": "author_checked_independent_review_pending", "split": "quarantine" } }, { "type": "Joined decision case", "scope": "Exact stored case, including project annotations", "record": { "case_id": "decision:CHN-ES-11-1-20220302", "country": "China", "country_iso3": "CHN", "event_date": "2022-03-02", "title": "Aggression against Ukraine — March 2022", "proposal_symbol": "A/ES-11/L.1", "resolution_symbol": "A/RES/ES-11/1", "proposal_summary": "The draft condemns the aggression against Ukraine and demands that Russia end its use of force and withdraw its forces.", "observed_action": "abstaining", "statement_kind": "explanation_of_vote", "statement_summary": "China said the resolution lacked sufficient consultation and attention to security concerns and diplomatic settlement; it abstained. It also affirmed respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.", "setting": "The General Assembly's eleventh emergency special session considered a draft on Russia's use of force against Ukraine after the Security Council referred the issue to the Assembly under the Uniting for Peace procedure.", "decision_rule": "Recorded General Assembly vote on the draft; the resolution is a collective Assembly decision, not a treaty or a negotiated bilateral agreement.", "assembly_result": "Adopted 141 in favor, 5 against, 35 abstaining.", "clauses": [ { "id": "OP1", "text": "Reaffirms Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders." }, { "id": "OP2-4", "text": "Deplores Russia's aggression and demands an immediate end to force and a complete, unconditional withdrawal." }, { "id": "OP5-6", "text": "Rejects Russia's recognition of separatist areas in Donetsk and Luhansk and demands reversal." }, { "id": "OP9-12", "text": "Calls for civilian protection, safe passage, humanitarian access and observance of humanitarian law." }, { "id": "OP14-15", "text": "Urges political dialogue, negotiation and mediation to resolve the conflict peacefully." } ], "national_position": { "statement_time": "after_vote", "speaker": "Zhang Jun, China", "source_url": "https://docs.un.org/A/ES-11/PV.5", "positions": [ "Affirmed respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.", "Said the draft had not received full membership consultation and did not sufficiently address the crisis's history and complexity.", "Argued that indivisible security and diplomatic settlement deserved more emphasis; explicitly linked these concerns to China's abstention." ], "synthesis": "China affirmed the sovereignty principle in OP1 and supported diplomatic settlement in OP14–15, but its post-vote explanation objected to consultation and to the draft's treatment of security concerns. It explicitly connected those stated objections to abstaining; it did not reject every provision.", "evidence_limit": "This is a post-vote explanation of China's stated reasons. It cannot be placed in a pre-vote prediction prompt. It does not establish a private bargaining threshold." }, "group_id": "unga:meeting:ES-11:5", "tasks": [ { "id": "vote_reconstruction", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Report only what the supplied historical evidence establishes. Do not infer private motives or bargaining conditions." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Country: China\nDecision date: 2022-03-02\nDraft: A/ES-11/L.1\nMeeting setting: The General Assembly's eleventh emergency special session considered a draft on Russia's use of force against Ukraine after the Security Council referred the issue to the Assembly under the Uniting for Peace procedure.\nProposal provisions (project paraphrases):\nOP1: Reaffirms Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.\nOP2-4: Deplores Russia's aggression and demands an immediate end to force and a complete, unconditional withdrawal.\nOP5-6: Rejects Russia's recognition of separatist areas in Donetsk and Luhansk and demands reversal.\nOP9-12: Calls for civilian protection, safe passage, humanitarian access and observance of humanitarian law.\nOP14-15: Urges political dialogue, negotiation and mediation to resolve the conflict peacefully.\nUsing this draft-only context, which recorded final vote matches the country? Answer with only: in favor, against, or abstaining." } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "abstaining" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } }, "inspection": "Exact roll-call label. Draft-only baseline; no claimed causal or predictive validity." }, { "id": "grounded_decision_report", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Report only what the supplied historical evidence establishes. Do not infer private motives or bargaining conditions." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Country: China\nDecision date: 2022-03-02\nDraft: A/ES-11/L.1\nMeeting setting: The General Assembly's eleventh emergency special session considered a draft on Russia's use of force against Ukraine after the Security Council referred the issue to the Assembly under the Uniting for Peace procedure.\nProposal provisions (project paraphrases):\nOP1: Reaffirms Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.\nOP2-4: Deplores Russia's aggression and demands an immediate end to force and a complete, unconditional withdrawal.\nOP5-6: Rejects Russia's recognition of separatist areas in Donetsk and Luhansk and demands reversal.\nOP9-12: Calls for civilian protection, safe passage, humanitarian access and observance of humanitarian law.\nOP14-15: Urges political dialogue, negotiation and mediation to resolve the conflict peacefully.\nRecorded final vote: abstaining\nAssembly result: Adopted 141 in favor, 5 against, 35 abstaining.\nAttributed public position by Zhang Jun, China (after vote):\n- Affirmed respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.\n- Said the draft had not received full membership consultation and did not sufficiently address the crisis's history and complexity.\n- Argued that indivisible security and diplomatic settlement deserved more emphasis; explicitly linked these concerns to China's abstention.\nSource-status note: This is a post-vote explanation of China's stated reasons. It cannot be placed in a pre-vote prediction prompt. It does not establish a private bargaining threshold.\nWrite an evidence-grounded decision report connecting specific proposal provisions to the attributed public position. State the observed outcome and the limits of inference." } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "Observed action: China voted abstaining on A/ES-11/L.1. The Assembly adopted 141 in favor, 5 against, 35 abstaining.\nPublic position and proposal relationship: China affirmed the sovereignty principle in OP1 and supported diplomatic settlement in OP14–15, but its post-vote explanation objected to consultation and to the draft's treatment of security concerns. It explicitly connected those stated objections to abstaining; it did not reject every provision.\nEvidence limit: This is a post-vote explanation of China's stated reasons. It cannot be placed in a pre-vote prediction prompt. It does not establish a private bargaining threshold." } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } }, "inspection": "Check clause references, vote, speaker, temporal status, source support and uncertainty." } ], "sources": { "draft": "https://documents.un.org/api/symbol/access?l=en&s=A%2FES-11%2FL.1&t=pdf", "vote": "https://docs.un.org/A/ES-11/PV.5", "statement": "https://docs.un.org/A/ES-11/PV.5" }, "status": "Source checked; independent review pending. Quarantined; not admitted to training or fresh evaluation." } }, { "type": "Supervised training row", "scope": "Exact saved prompt and completion", "record": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "You are a retrospective policy-memo writer. The upstream content plan supplies the positions, conditions and uncertainty. Express it faithfully as prose. Preserve country, institutional capacity and date. Do not invent facts, agreement, recorded votes or commitments. Distinguish documented positions from analyst proposals. Return only the requested public memo." }, { "role": "user", "content": "SCENARIO\nCompare the four delegations' documented positions in the 9 December 2021 climate/security debate. This authored workshop did not occur historically.\n\nWrite a policy-analysis memo covering France, the UK, India and Brazil: what is documented common ground, what material differences or conditions remain, and what next steps could be proposed without inventing agreement? Address the questions in each country's brief.\nUse at most 700 words, including quoted evidence. Distinguish documented common ground, unresolved differences, and your own proposed next steps. A proposal is not a government commitment. Do not assert that a negotiation or vote occurred.\nNational questions:\nFRA: Based on France’s statement of 9 December 2021, what role should the Security Council play in addressing climate-related insecurity? Explain why a response limited to armed forces and peacekeepers would be insufficient, and identify one complementary measure France supported.\nGBR: Summarize the UK’s position on climate-security reporting and participation on 9 December 2021, including what it said about the draft before the Council. Does this statement also establish that the UK had approved binding national carbon quotas imposed by the Council?\nIND: An analyst writes: “India objected to a Security Council climate role because it denied that climate change could exacerbate conflict.” Assess this characterization against India’s 9 December 2021 statement. Explain its institutional preference and the qualification in its position.\nBRA: What institutional response to climate change did Brazil prefer in its 9 December 2021 statement, and why? Include both its view of climate-related harms and its proposed practical priority.\n\nCONTENT PLAN PROVIDED BY THE UPSTREAM PLANNER\nThe intended positions and uncertainty are GIVEN. Write a complete prose memo from this plan.\nPreserve every national point and its scope. Use the supplied common ground, differences and proposal.\nDo not add positions, votes or commitments. References identify the sources behind the plan.\n\nFRA: national UN Security Council delegation; 2021-12-09; S/PV.8923; [climate-fra]\n- France supports the Council anticipating, assessing, preventing and addressing climate-related insecurity, particularly for vulnerable populations. [climate-fra]\n- Armed forces and peacekeepers alone are insufficient. Longer-term responses need understanding of climate-crisis links and stronger resilience of States and their populations. [climate-fra]\n- Complementary measures include better natural-resource allocation and the Great Green Wall. France also supports predictable, sustainable UN logistical and financial support for the G-5 Sahel Joint Force. [climate-fra]\n\nGBR: national UN Security Council delegation; 2021-12-09; S/PV.8923; [climate-gbr]\n- The UK supports comprehensive UN reporting on climate-security links, a role for the Security Council alongside other UN bodies, and the submitted draft as an important first step. [climate-gbr]\n- The UK supports meaningful participation of women and girls in a fully inclusive approach; their role is not limited to being victims. [climate-gbr]\n- This statement does not establish UK approval of Council-imposed binding national carbon quotas. This is an absence of established approval, not evidence of rejection. [climate-gbr]\n\nIND: national UN Security Council delegation; 2021-12-09; S/PV.8923; [climate-ind]\n- India acknowledges that climate change has affected lives and exacerbated conflicts. The analyst's claim that India denied every climate-conflict connection is incorrect. [climate-ind]\n- India prefers the UNFCCC/COP's inclusive, consensus-driven process with developing-country participation and opposes an alternative Council climate platform that could disrupt that process. [climate-ind]\n- India warns against climate-only explanations of conflict and says the effect of climate variability on violence is contested. Attribute this argument to India rather than declaring a settled scientific conclusion. [climate-ind]\n- India supports adequate sustainable resources, training and logistics for the G-5 Sahel Joint Force. [climate-ind]\n\nBRA: national UN Security Council delegation; 2021-12-09; S/PV.8923; [climate-bra]\n- Brazil prefers the inclusive UNFCCC forum, respecting mandates and avoiding duplication. It objects to reallocating the climate agenda to the Council and cautions against a strict security lens. [climate-bra]\n- Brazil acknowledges climate-related threats to health, food and water security and development; Sahel resource depletion can exacerbate tensions and displacement. [climate-bra]\n- Brazil prioritizes mobilization, scaling-up and timely delivery of developed-country finance for developing countries, supporting existing commitments and enhanced climate action. [climate-bra]\n\nCOMMON GROUND\n- All four acknowledge climate-related harms; their descriptions of security links and institutional responses differ. This does not establish all-four endorsement of an existential security threat or a separate Council platform.\n\nDIFFERENCES\n- France and the UK support a Council role; India and Brazil prefer climate matters within the inclusive UNFCCC process. Do not attribute a UNFCCC-primary-forum position to all four.\n- Explicit G-5 Joint Force support is established for France and India. It is not established by the supplied UK/Brazil statements; that silence does not establish opposition.\n\nPROPOSALS\n- Analyst proposal, not an agreed commitment: explore mandate-respecting reporting that preserves the institutional disagreement, and examine timely finance for existing climate commitments without claiming all four endorsed that financing priority." } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "Comparative policy memo: 9 December 2021 climate/security statements (S/PV.8923)\n\nDocumented national positions\n\nFrance's national Security Council delegation supports anticipating, assessing, preventing and addressing climate-related insecurity, particularly for vulnerable populations. Armed forces and peacekeepers alone are insufficient: longer-term responses require understanding climate-crisis links and strengthening the resilience of States and their populations. Complementary measures include better natural-resource allocation and the Great Green Wall. France supports predictable, sustainable UN logistical and financial support for the G-5 Sahel Joint Force.\n\nThe UK supports comprehensive UN reporting on climate-security links and a Council role alongside other UN bodies. It describes the submitted draft as an important first step. Women and girls must participate meaningfully in a fully inclusive approach, beyond being treated as victims. The statement does not establish UK approval of Council-imposed binding national carbon quotas; absence of established approval is not evidence of rejection.\n\nIndia acknowledges that climate change has affected lives and exacerbated conflicts, so the analyst's absolute-denial characterization is incorrect. India prefers the inclusive, consensus-driven UNFCCC/COP process with developing-country participation and opposes an alternative Council climate platform that could disrupt it. India warns against climate-only explanations of conflict and describes the effect of climate variability on violence as contested. This is India's argument, not a declaration of settled scientific fact. India also supports adequate sustainable resources, training and logistics for the G-5 Sahel Joint Force.\n\nBrazil prefers the inclusive UNFCCC forum, respecting mandates and avoiding duplication. It objects to reallocating the climate agenda to the Council and cautions against a strict security lens. Brazil nevertheless acknowledges climate-related threats to health, food and water security and development; Sahel resource depletion can exacerbate tensions and displacement. Its practical priority is mobilizing, scaling up and delivering developed-country finance for developing countries in a timely way, supporting existing commitments and enhanced climate action.\n\nDocumented common ground\n\nAll four acknowledge climate-related harms. Their descriptions of security links and institutional responses differ; this does not establish agreement on an existential security threat or a separate Council platform.\n\nUnresolved differences\n\nFrance and the UK support a Council role; India and Brazil prefer climate matters within the inclusive UNFCCC process. A UNFCCC-primary-forum position is not established for all four. Explicit G-5 Joint Force support is established for France and India, but not by the supplied UK or Brazilian statements. Their silence does not establish opposition.\n\nProposed next steps\n\nAn analyst could explore mandate-respecting reporting that preserves the Council/UNFCCC disagreement and examine timely finance for existing climate commitments. These are proposals, not government commitments or an agreed all-four financing priority. This authored workshop did not historically occur; no negotiation or vote is asserted." } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } }, "metadata": { "id": "a77dca28531826a79a2ddd97", "row_index": 0, "example_sha256": "beba75784acf85132494fa69f6e840c6be8ac0e515ca1e9ffe1d182214ea8f12", "split": "train", "split_group": "unsc-climate-security-2021", "status": "research_prepared", "machine_checks_passed": true, "training_admitted": false, "human_reviewed": false, "independent_review_complete": false, "country_iso3": "ALL", "countries": [ "FRA", "GBR", "IND", "BRA" ], "source_text_digests": { "climate-fra": "8a81bf2d53146fd711de10e6dc7f2c71ccf1d894ed2ed9a9f0f5d4d91e37f179", "climate-gbr": "48d70a54d0a6fa25a9ce7f6b41538c94d91a584d36cd13175c6baaa07721f09f", "climate-ind": "15d1012c430081ecd34a682c5623e40e92d7c30a928f20a6162a5875d0b004ff", "climate-bra": "c349cdad37f6a129d2f5c57de4bfeb83bf634fd0accb1c0980da81d61f209292" }, "derivation": "This session's LLM assistant; complete analyst memos authored from the frozen checked plans and original statements, after inspecting base errors. Not authentic government utterances or independent review.", "model_revision": "851bf6e806efd8d0a36b00ddf55e13ccb7b8cd0a", "tokenizer_lock_sha256": "c5b25e657de7191574f75a3791043c85a71f1b53fae0c0893f011e885d248610", "case_sha256": "ac9dd94aae85ac14002803eb4c5d2377f493732770706f2530b0c14545c71462", "plan_sha256": "87c59771bed64850a0e05b4a0fa3ec830acc5858ef2c1981c38c9f35b9466ff2", "training_prompt_is_evaluation_prompt": true, "target_words": 434 } } ], "policy_examples": [ { "country": "CHN", "id": "CHN-development-conditions-demo", "date": "2021-01-10", "language": "en", "question": "A proposed development agreement requires the recipient to change its domestic political system. How does that compare with the white paper's stated approach, and can we infer that every Chinese project complies?", "answer": "That requirement conflicts with the white paper's stated opposition to political strings and interference in a recipient's chosen development path. It also emphasizes recipient leadership of projects. These are published principles; they do not establish the terms or conduct of every Chinese-financed project. [CHN-development-conditions-2021; CHN-development-recipient-leadership-2021]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified government at the stated policy date. Use the supplied evidence. Distinguish stated policy, recorded action and inference; acknowledge unsupported details. Do not invent private motives or fixed national traits.", "context": "Country: CHN\nPolicy date: 2021-01-10", "evidence": [ { "id": "CHN-development-conditions-2021", "claim": "China's 2021 white paper states that development cooperation should respect countries' chosen development paths and should not involve interference, imposed political conditions or pursuit of political self-interest. This is its stated policy, not independent verification of every project.", "source_url": "https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/publications/Whitep/202101/P020210122374486901993.pdf", "spans": [ { "source_id": "china_development_whitepaper", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-knowledge-20260914/source-text/china_development_whitepaper.txt", "text_sha256": "3eb25057926988699e988451b88f809d3c45226f441693a8587fb6ce0af3a8bb", "char_start": 10383, "char_end": 10677, "pdf_pages": [ 6 ] } ] }, { "id": "CHN-development-recipient-leadership-2021", "claim": "The white paper describes cooperation projects as being proposed, agreed and led by recipient countries.", "source_url": "https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/publications/Whitep/202101/P020210122374486901993.pdf", "spans": [ { "source_id": "china_development_whitepaper", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-knowledge-20260914/source-text/china_development_whitepaper.txt", "text_sha256": "3eb25057926988699e988451b88f809d3c45226f441693a8587fb6ce0af3a8bb", "char_start": 14202, "char_end": 14268, "pdf_pages": [ 8 ] } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Applies the stated condition to the proposal", "Attributes the principle to the white paper", "Does not turn a government statement into independent proof of compliance" ], "metadata": { "id": "CHN-development-conditions-demo", "date": "2021-01-10", "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_ids": [ "policy:china_development_whitepaper_2021" ], "derivation": "assistant_authored_from_cited_evidence_not_authentic_QA", "review_status": "author_checked_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Conversion of existing messages to prompt/completion; not an exported training row", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified government at the stated policy date. Use the supplied evidence. Distinguish stated policy, recorded action and inference; acknowledge unsupported details. Do not invent private motives or fixed national traits." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Country: CHN\nPolicy date: 2021-01-10\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: A proposed development agreement requires the recipient to change its domestic political system. How does that compare with the white paper's stated approach, and can we infer that every Chinese project complies?" } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "That requirement conflicts with the white paper's stated opposition to political strings and interference in a recipient's chosen development path. It also emphasizes recipient leadership of projects. These are published principles; they do not establish the terms or conduct of every Chinese-financed project. [CHN-development-conditions-2021; CHN-development-recipient-leadership-2021]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } }, { "country": "DEU", "id": "DEU-critical-inputs-demo", "date": "2023-07-13", "language": "en", "question": "Assess a proposal to source all critical energy-transition inputs from a single Chinese supplier. Would the stated strategy instead require ending all economic and climate cooperation with China?", "answer": "The proposal would raise a critical-dependency concern under our 2023 China Strategy: energy-transition inputs are among the areas it identifies for reducing dependence. Diversification would be consistent with that policy, but the source does not determine approval of this particular contract. The strategy seeks to preserve economic ties and cooperate on climate; it does not call for ending all cooperation with China. [DEU-china-economic-dependencies-2023; DEU-china-climate-cooperation-2023]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified government at the stated policy date. Use the supplied evidence. Distinguish stated policy, recorded action and inference; acknowledge unsupported details. Do not invent private motives or fixed national traits.", "context": "Country: DEU\nPolicy date: 2023-07-13", "evidence": [ { "id": "DEU-china-economic-dependencies-2023", "claim": "Germany's 2023 strategy seeks to preserve economic ties with China while reducing dependencies in critical sectors. It identifies medicines, medical technology, rare earths, energy-transition inputs and semiconductor supply chains as concerns.", "source_url": "https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/resource/blob/2608580/49d50fecc479304c3da2e2079c55e106/china-strategie-en-data.pdf", "spans": [ { "source_id": "germany_china_strategy", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-knowledge-20260914/source-text/germany_china_strategy.txt", "text_sha256": "f0f2755231f3c33330e3ec0cb394b370f21b522dcb1bfcbd85bfb0438e08333f", "char_start": 35745, "char_end": 36500, "pdf_pages": [ 25 ] } ] }, { "id": "DEU-china-climate-cooperation-2023", "claim": "Germany's 2023 strategy treats cooperation with China as necessary for addressing climate change and identifies China as an important actor on biodiversity and global health.", "source_url": "https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/resource/blob/2608580/49d50fecc479304c3da2e2079c55e106/china-strategie-en-data.pdf", "spans": [ { "source_id": "germany_china_strategy", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-knowledge-20260914/source-text/germany_china_strategy.txt", "text_sha256": "f0f2755231f3c33330e3ec0cb394b370f21b522dcb1bfcbd85bfb0438e08333f", "char_start": 5378, "char_end": 6123, "pdf_pages": [ 10 ] } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Identifies concentration risk as an application of the strategy", "Distinguishes de-risking from blanket decoupling", "Preserves climate cooperation", "Does not invent contract approval or a numeric concentration limit" ], "metadata": { "id": "DEU-critical-inputs-demo", "date": "2023-07-13", "split": "quarantine", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_ids": [ "policy:germany_china_strategy" ], "derivation": "assistant_authored_from_cited_evidence_not_authentic_QA", "review_status": "author_checked_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Conversion of existing messages to prompt/completion; not an exported training row", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified government at the stated policy date. Use the supplied evidence. Distinguish stated policy, recorded action and inference; acknowledge unsupported details. Do not invent private motives or fixed national traits." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Country: DEU\nPolicy date: 2023-07-13\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: Assess a proposal to source all critical energy-transition inputs from a single Chinese supplier. Would the stated strategy instead require ending all economic and climate cooperation with China?" } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "The proposal would raise a critical-dependency concern under our 2023 China Strategy: energy-transition inputs are among the areas it identifies for reducing dependence. Diversification would be consistent with that policy, but the source does not determine approval of this particular contract. The strategy seeks to preserve economic ties and cooperate on climate; it does not call for ending all cooperation with China. [DEU-china-economic-dependencies-2023; DEU-china-climate-cooperation-2023]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } }, { "country": "FRA", "id": "FRA-european-defence-2025:application", "date": "2025-07-14", "language": "en", "question": "What combination of European and Atlantic defence priorities does this review support?", "answer": "The review combines a stronger European pillar within the Atlantic Alliance with greater European capabilities and a preference for European-made solutions. European autonomy and Atlantic cooperation are presented together. [FRA-european-defence-2025]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification.", "context": "Represented entity: France\nPolicy date: 2025-07-14\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position", "evidence": [ { "id": "FRA-european-defence-2025", "claim": "France's 2025 review calls for stronger European defence capabilities within the Atlantic Alliance and prioritizing European-made solutions.", "source_url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/20250713_NP_SGDSN_RNS2025_EN_1_0.pdf", "spans": [ { "document_id": "france_sgdsn:FRA-security-2025-en", "source_url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/20250713_NP_SGDSN_RNS2025_EN_1_0.pdf", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/source-text/FRA-security-2025-en.txt", "text_sha256": "95ae247b517e13cee03bf258b908287d3c38b9e2daafe1223463aca4ea7903e6", "raw_sha256": "036a958fcc610c446add5cc8ee5df9af1cc06663313f2ccc146141d14d64e6ca", "char_start": 11941, "char_end": 12481, "pdf_start_page": 9, "pdf_end_page": 9, "language": "en" } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Preserves European capability and procurement priorities", "Does not equate autonomy with leaving NATO" ], "metadata": { "id": "FRA-european-defence-2025:application", "date": "2025-07-14", "split": "quarantine", "proposed_split": "train", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_id": "policy:france_security_2025", "split_group": "policy:france_security_2025", "derivation": "assistant_authored_not_authentic_QA_or_model_output", "review_status": "assistant_curated_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Existing SFT export", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Represented entity: France\nPolicy date: 2025-07-14\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: What combination of European and Atlantic defence priorities does this review support?" } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "The review combines a stronger European pillar within the Atlantic Alliance with greater European capabilities and a preference for European-made solutions. European autonomy and Atlantic cooperation are presented together. [FRA-european-defence-2025]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } }, { "country": "GBR", "id": "GBR-climate-2035-2025:application", "date": "2025-01-30", "language": "en", "question": "State the target precisely, including the baseline and exclusions. Is it a GDP-intensity target?", "answer": "The target is at least an 81% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2035 relative to 1990, excluding international aviation and shipping. It is an emissions-reduction target, not a reduction in emissions per unit of GDP. [GBR-climate-2035-2025]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification.", "context": "Represented entity: United Kingdom\nPolicy date: 2025-01-30\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position", "evidence": [ { "id": "GBR-climate-2035-2025", "claim": "The UK's submitted target is at least an 81% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2035 relative to 1990, excluding international aviation and shipping.", "source_url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/679b655f6bb4c44f0805e7bc/uk-2035-nationally-determined-contribution-large-print.pdf", "spans": [ { "document_id": "uk_desnz:GBR-ndc-2035-government-en", "source_url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/679b655f6bb4c44f0805e7bc/uk-2035-nationally-determined-contribution-large-print.pdf", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/source-text/GBR-ndc-2035-government-en.txt", "text_sha256": "18deeee1a928c9c2bb505c3d0b4bedb3db5b33a67f9b77afd1bd97f95fcee114", "raw_sha256": "83049a366ec2c98dbbc2ca6d80224649c654d37c61f3f556607b9a0849b53f7c", "char_start": 1750, "char_end": 1942, "pdf_start_page": 6, "pdf_end_page": 6, "language": "en" } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Preserves 81%, 1990 and 2035", "Retains aviation/shipping exclusion", "Does not confuse emissions with GDP intensity" ], "metadata": { "id": "GBR-climate-2035-2025:application", "date": "2025-01-30", "split": "quarantine", "proposed_split": "train", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_id": "ndc:uk_2035", "split_group": "ndc:uk_2035", "derivation": "assistant_authored_not_authentic_QA_or_model_output", "review_status": "assistant_curated_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Existing SFT export", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Represented entity: United Kingdom\nPolicy date: 2025-01-30\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: State the target precisely, including the baseline and exclusions. Is it a GDP-intensity target?" } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "The target is at least an 81% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2035 relative to 1990, excluding international aviation and shipping. It is an emissions-reduction target, not a reduction in emissions per unit of GDP. [GBR-climate-2035-2025]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } }, { "country": "IND", "id": "IND-fisheries-subsidies-2020:application", "date": "2020-11-25", "language": "en", "question": "What qualifications would India seek to preserve when considering disciplines on harmful fisheries subsidies, according to this report?", "answer": "The report accepts the need for disciplines on harmful subsidies while emphasizing livelihood protections and policy space for subsistence, artisanal and small-scale fishers. A useful representation must preserve both the discipline and that qualification. [IND-fisheries-subsidies-2020]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification.", "context": "Represented entity: India\nPolicy date: 2020-11-25\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position", "evidence": [ { "id": "IND-fisheries-subsidies-2020", "claim": "India's report supports disciplines on harmful fisheries subsidies while demanding policy space and differential treatment for subsistence, artisanal and small-scale fishers.", "source_url": "https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g403_e.pdf", "spans": [ { "document_id": "wto_government_reports:IND-wto-2021-en", "source_url": "https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g403_e.pdf", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/source-text/IND-wto-2021-en.txt", "text_sha256": "6440f6c162cd12188cdb9788cc25c7925356c7551ab46308a19e1b49d48b64b7", "raw_sha256": "bae4c705901a78344b854ff8e1939939acb5bbc330f0ac83c840ee295e2824eb", "char_start": 56773, "char_end": 58057, "pdf_start_page": 17, "pdf_end_page": 17, "language": "en" } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Preserves support for disciplines", "Preserves the livelihood and policy-space qualification" ], "metadata": { "id": "IND-fisheries-subsidies-2020:application", "date": "2020-11-25", "split": "quarantine", "proposed_split": "train", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_id": "wto:WT/TPR/G/403", "split_group": "wto:WT/TPR/G/403", "derivation": "assistant_authored_not_authentic_QA_or_model_output", "review_status": "assistant_curated_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Existing SFT export", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Represented entity: India\nPolicy date: 2020-11-25\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: What qualifications would India seek to preserve when considering disciplines on harmful fisheries subsidies, according to this report?" } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "The report accepts the need for disciplines on harmful subsidies while emphasizing livelihood protections and policy space for subsistence, artisanal and small-scale fishers. A useful representation must preserve both the discipline and that qualification. [IND-fisheries-subsidies-2020]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } }, { "country": "BRA", "id": "BRA-wto-differential-treatment-2022:application", "date": "2022-10-19", "language": "en", "question": "Distinguish the position this report describes for Brazil itself from the treatment it supports for other developing members.", "answer": "The report describes Brazil’s decision to begin forgoing special and differential treatment in negotiations, while retaining support for needs-based flexibility for least-developed and other developing members. This dated position should not be generalized to all countries or assumed unchanged today. [BRA-wto-differential-treatment-2022]", "system": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification.", "context": "Represented entity: Brazil\nPolicy date: 2022-10-19\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position", "evidence": [ { "id": "BRA-wto-differential-treatment-2022", "claim": "Brazil's 2022 report describes its 2019 decision to begin forgoing special and differential treatment in current and future WTO negotiations while supporting needs-based flexibility for other developing members.", "source_url": "https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g432_e.pdf", "spans": [ { "document_id": "wto_government_reports:BRA-wto-2022-en", "source_url": "https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g432_e.pdf", "text_file": "data/prepared/country-extension-20260914/source-text/BRA-wto-2022-en.txt", "text_sha256": "7558db6a62b77142a2557edd7d2b15ed2728c37909cfb403e99f31e82bbd7b51", "raw_sha256": "4cbc5795cfa43ccc6cffa3e1f6aa19258eaf52ac2bfeee9d8a376904823fa623", "char_start": 75440, "char_end": 76128, "pdf_start_page": 19, "pdf_end_page": 19, "language": "en" } ] } ], "rubric": [ "Distinguishes Brazil's own choice from treatment of others", "Preserves negotiation scope", "Avoids assuming the 2022 position is current" ], "metadata": { "id": "BRA-wto-differential-treatment-2022:application", "date": "2022-10-19", "split": "quarantine", "proposed_split": "train", "training_admitted": false, "fresh_evaluation_eligible": false, "group_id": "wto:WT/TPR/G/432", "split_group": "wto:WT/TPR/G/432", "derivation": "assistant_authored_not_authentic_QA_or_model_output", "review_status": "assistant_curated_independent_review_pending" }, "format_origin": "Existing SFT export", "format": { "prompt": [ { "role": "system", "content": "Answer as a research simulation of the specified institution, using the supplied dated evidence. Preserve conditions, scope and uncertainty. Attribute government claims; do not invent private motives or confuse public statements with independent verification." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Represented entity: Brazil\nPolicy date: 2022-10-19\nSource language: en\nScope: national public position\nEvidence: [SOURCE PASSAGES OMITTED FROM PUBLIC PREVIEW; see source links and span metadata]\nQuestion: Distinguish the position this report describes for Brazil itself from the treatment it supports for other developing members." } ], "completion": [ { "role": "assistant", "content": "The report describes Brazil’s decision to begin forgoing special and differential treatment in negotiations, while retaining support for needs-based flexibility for least-developed and other developing members. This dated position should not be generalized to all countries or assumed unchanged today. [BRA-wto-differential-treatment-2022]" } ], "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": false } } } ], "countries": [ { "code": "CHN", "name": "China", "flag": "assets/flags/cn.svg", "count": 41632, "source_collections": 12, "languages": [ "ar", "en", "es", "fr", "ru", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evaluation": 208, "evidence_passages": 6165, "observed_actions": 1089, "policy_applications": 1, "policy_positions": 2, "review_and_lineage": 12603, "source_records": 34330, "training_views": 20432 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 30034, "National policy & diplomacy": 1839, "UN speeches": 991, "UNGA votes": 6354, "Human-rights records": 2361, "WTO policy reports": 0, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 6, "Linked task samples": 4 }, "sources": [ { "id": "mfa", "count": 30034, "dates": [ "2022-06-14", "2026-09-11" ] }, { "id": "china_mission", "count": 1762, "dates": [ "2022-11-30", "2026-09-11" ] }, { "id": "national_policy_documents", "count": 77, "dates": [ "2021-01-10", "2024-06-12" ] }, { "id": "uhri", "count": 2259, "dates": [ "2008-05-23", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 4, "dates": [ "2021-01-10", "2022-03-02" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 915, "dates": [ "1993", "2017-12-20" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 6354, "dates": [ "1971-11-09", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "ungdc", "count": 76, "dates": [ "1946", "2022" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 102, "dates": [ "2023-11-03", "2023-11-03" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "unbench", "count": 4, "dates": [ "2024-10-30", "2024-11-01" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] } ] }, { "code": "DEU", "name": "Germany", "flag": "assets/flags/de.svg", "count": 13561, "source_collections": 12, "languages": [ "ar", "de", "en", "es", "fr", "ja", "pl", "pt", "ru", "uk", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evaluation": 148, "evidence_passages": 1413, "observed_actions": 825, "policy_applications": 2, "policy_positions": 3, "review_and_lineage": 4968, "source_records": 11273, "training_views": 5477 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 1720, "National policy & diplomacy": 2165, "UN speeches": 531, "UNGA votes": 6139, "Human-rights records": 2955, "WTO policy reports": 0, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 8, "Linked task samples": 0 }, "sources": [ { "id": "germany_aa", "count": 1336, "dates": [ "2023-02-13", "2026-09-08" ] }, { "id": "germany_press", "count": 1720, "dates": [ "2024-09-24", "2026-09-07" ] }, { "id": "germany_mission", "count": 452, "dates": [ "2022-01-18", "2026-09-01" ] }, { "id": "national_policy_documents", "count": 377, "dates": [ "2023-06-14", "2023-07-13" ] }, { "id": "uhri", "count": 2797, "dates": [ "2008-05-22", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 6, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2023-07-13" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 481, "dates": [ "1993", "2017-09-11" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 6139, "dates": [ "1973-10-26", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "ungdc", "count": 50, "dates": [ "1973", "2022" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 158, "dates": [ "2023-09-01", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] } ] }, { "code": "FRA", "name": "France", "flag": "assets/flags/fr.svg", "count": 12317, "source_collections": 10, "languages": [ "ar", "de", "en", "es", "fr", "ru", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evidence_passages": 746, "observed_actions": 8354, "policy_applications": 3, "policy_positions": 4, "review_and_lineage": 20, "source_records": 3165, "training_views": 2 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 0, "National policy & diplomacy": 525, "UN speeches": 491, "UNGA votes": 7509, "Human-rights records": 3737, "WTO policy reports": 0, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 12, "Linked task samples": 0 }, "sources": [ { "id": "france_mfa", "count": 55, "dates": [ "2025", "2025" ] }, { "id": "france_elysee", "count": 7, "dates": [ "2025-09-22", "2025-09-22" ] }, { "id": "france_sgdsn", "count": 463, "dates": [ "2025-07-14", "2025-07-14" ] }, { "id": "uhri", "count": 3505, "dates": [ "2008-05-22", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 10, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2025-07-14" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 491, "dates": [ "1993", "2017-06-22" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 7509, "dates": [ "1946-01-26", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 232, "dates": [ "2023-03-07", "2023-03-07" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] } ] }, { "code": "GBR", "name": "United Kingdom", "flag": "assets/flags/gb.svg", "count": 11054, "source_collections": 12, "languages": [ "ar", "en", "es", "fr", "ru", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evidence_passages": 520, "observed_actions": 8186, "policy_applications": 3, "policy_positions": 4, "review_and_lineage": 20, "source_records": 2296, "training_views": 3 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 0, "National policy & diplomacy": 231, "UN speeches": 508, "UNGA votes": 7509, "Human-rights records": 2689, "WTO policy reports": 57, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 12, "Linked task samples": 5 }, "sources": [ { "id": "uhri", "count": 2447, "dates": [ "2008-05-13", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 10, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2025-06-24" ] }, { "id": "uk_cabinet_office", "count": 64, "dates": [ "2025-06-24", "2025-06-24" ] }, { "id": "uk_fcdo", "count": 5, "dates": [ "2025-09-26", "2025-09-26" ] }, { "id": "uk_desnz", "count": 162, "dates": [ "2025-01-30", "2025-01-30" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 508, "dates": [ "1993", "2018" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 7509, "dates": [ "1946-01-26", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 242, "dates": [ "2022-08-17", "2022-08-17" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "unbench", "count": 5, "dates": [ "2016-12-23", "2020-05-29" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] }, { "id": "wto", "count": 57, "dates": [ "2025-10-28", "2025-10-28" ] } ] }, { "code": "IND", "name": "India", "flag": "assets/flags/in.svg", "count": 10612, "source_collections": 10, "languages": [ "ar", "en", "es", "fr", "ru", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evidence_passages": 272, "observed_actions": 8265, "policy_applications": 3, "policy_positions": 5, "review_and_lineage": 20, "source_records": 2022, "training_views": 3 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 0, "National policy & diplomacy": 9, "UN speeches": 1047, "UNGA votes": 7509, "Human-rights records": 1949, "WTO policy reports": 41, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 14, "Linked task samples": 0 }, "sources": [ { "id": "india_un_mission", "count": 5, "dates": [ "2025-09-27", "2025-09-27" ] }, { "id": "india_pib", "count": 4, "dates": [ "2022-08-03", "2022-08-03" ] }, { "id": "uhri", "count": 1718, "dates": [ "2008-05-23", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 12, "dates": [ "2020-11-25", "2025-07-08" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 1047, "dates": [ "1993", "2017-12-05" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 7509, "dates": [ "1946-01-26", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 231, "dates": [ "2022-08-17", "2022-08-17" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] }, { "id": "wto", "count": 41, "dates": [ "2021", "2021" ] } ] }, { "code": "BRA", "name": "Brazil", "flag": "assets/flags/br.svg", "count": 11234, "source_collections": 10, "languages": [ "ar", "en", "es", "fr", "pt", "ru", "zh" ], "kinds": { "country_profiles": 1, "country_statistics": 43, "decision_cases": 2, "evidence_passages": 611, "observed_actions": 8234, "policy_applications": 4, "policy_positions": 5, "review_and_lineage": 20, "source_records": 2335, "training_views": 3 }, "groups": { "Press conferences": 0, "National policy & diplomacy": 326, "UN speeches": 849, "UNGA votes": 7509, "Human-rights records": 2395, "WTO policy reports": 97, "Country statistics": 43, "Annotations & joined cases": 15, "Linked task samples": 0 }, "sources": [ { "id": "brazil_funag", "count": 261, "dates": [] }, { "id": "brazil_mma", "count": 65, "dates": [ "2024-11-13", "2024-11-13" ] }, { "id": "uhri", "count": 2198, "dates": [ "2008-05-22", "2026-01-08" ] }, { "id": "curated", "count": 13, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2025-07-08" ] }, { "id": "unga_speech_corpus", "count": 849, "dates": [ "1993", "2018" ] }, { "id": "unga_dm", "count": 7509, "dates": [ "1946-01-26", "2023-09-01" ] }, { "id": "upr_reports", "count": 197, "dates": [ "2022-09-01", "2022-09-01" ] }, { "id": "decision_cases", "count": 2, "dates": [ "2022-03-02", "2022-10-12" ] }, { "id": "world_bank", "count": 43, "dates": [ "2020", "2024" ] }, { "id": "wto", "count": 97, "dates": [ "2022-10-19", "2022-10-19" ] } ] } ], "groups": [ "Press conferences", "National policy & diplomacy", "UN speeches", "UNGA votes", "Human-rights records", "WTO policy reports", "Country statistics", "Annotations & joined cases", "Linked task samples" ], "distinct_source_collections": 26, "languages": [ "ar", "de", "en", "es", "fr", "ja", "pl", "pt", "ru", "uk", "zh" ], "inventory_definition": "Distinct record_id per country across source records, passages, actions, statistics and curated annotations. Excludes training-format copies, review/lineage, evaluation wrappers and profiles. Each ID is assigned once, preferring its canonical version. Translations and derived spans remain separate IDs; these are not independent training traces.", "inventory_snapshot": "2026-09-14", "humor": { "model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct", "arms": { "base": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 52, "rate": 10.4 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 72, "rate": 14.4 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 43, "rate": 8.6 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 26, "rate": 5.2 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 122, "rate": 24.4 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 36, "rate": 7.2 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 80, "rate": 16.0 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 44, "rate": 8.8 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 21, "rate": 4.2 } }, "prompted-base": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 235, "rate": 47.0 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 200, "rate": 40.0 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 143, "rate": 28.6 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 91, "rate": 18.2 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 285, "rate": 57.0 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 193, "rate": 38.6 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 177, "rate": 35.4 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 237, "rate": 47.4 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 31, "rate": 6.2 } }, "author-full-sequential": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 329, "rate": 65.8 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 301, "rate": 60.2 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 301, "rate": 60.2 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 257, "rate": 51.4 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 298, "rate": 59.6 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 343, "rate": 68.6 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 329, "rate": 65.8 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 273, "rate": 54.6 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 271, "rate": 54.2 } }, "author-dpo": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 278, "rate": 55.6 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 298, "rate": 59.6 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 257, "rate": 51.4 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 204, "rate": 40.8 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 314, "rate": 62.8 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 327, "rate": 65.4 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 305, "rate": 61.0 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 312, "rate": 62.4 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 215, "rate": 43.0 } }, "reproduction-dpo": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 239, "rate": 47.8 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 283, "rate": 56.6 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 215, "rate": 43.0 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 131, "rate": 26.2 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 309, "rate": 61.8 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 297, "rate": 59.4 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 269, "rate": 53.8 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 287, "rate": 57.4 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 139, "rate": 27.8 } }, "reproduction-full-sequential": { "default": { "n": 500, "recognized": 293, "rate": 58.6 }, "0": { "n": 500, "recognized": 273, "rate": 54.6 }, "1": { "n": 500, "recognized": 270, "rate": 54.0 }, "2": { "n": 500, "recognized": 168, "rate": 33.6 }, "3": { "n": 500, "recognized": 301, "rate": 60.2 }, "4": { "n": 500, "recognized": 334, "rate": 66.8 }, "5": { "n": 500, "recognized": 324, "rate": 64.8 }, "6": { "n": 500, "recognized": 274, "rate": 54.8 }, "7": { "n": 500, "recognized": 176, "rate": 35.2 } } }, "questions": 500, "conditions": 9, "generations": 27000, "scope": "One-persona classifier recognition and style-removal robustness; no independent semantic-quality, country-policy or multi-agent claim.", "dependence": "The released classifier was trained on default generations for the same first 500 questions. Nine variants repeat each question; no independent-sample significance claim." }, "benchmarks": { "unsc": { "events": 469, "adopted": 258, "vetoed": 211, "vote_rows": 6619, "targets": { "FRA": { "Y": 374, "A": 78, "N": 17 }, "GBR": { "Y": 351, "A": 88, "N": 30 }, "IND": { "A": 20, "Y": 61, "N": 1 }, "BRA": { "Y": 109, "A": 15 } } }, "unbench": { "train": { "rows": 11010, "events": 734, "labels": { "Y": 10810, "A": 182, "Non-Voting": 3, "N": 15 }, "countries": 92 }, "test": { "rows": 6420, "events": 428, "labels": { "A": 209, "Y": 6210, "N": 1 }, "countries": 55 } } }, "planning_control": { "unit": "met atomic content units", "total": 24, "roles": 2, "conditions": [ { "label": "Raw source", "base": 18, "adapter": 18 }, { "label": "Checked plan", "base": 18, "adapter": 22 }, { "label": "Explicit-boundary plan", "base": 24, "adapter": 22 } ], "status": "Exposed development; one unblinded assistant authored plans and grades; independent review pending." }, "provenance": [ { "path": "explorer/overview.json", "sha256": "929279a5106d6020ef4d734fcfb26acc6509d2b6d2921f4aa458b19a0520d89d" }, { "path": "explorer/sources.json", "sha256": "c77202f4e5fa7e9f16e1c311617d240cd277d9d21680b3fad64a984ffdd0ee2a" }, { "path": "reports/open-character-reproduction-20261004.json", "sha256": "91f9055a189938a056d5e108a52eb1de15cbb20397bb6eb2a1668ab645639b84" }, { "path": "reports/eval-pilot-20260926/unbench-audit.json", "sha256": "98b659485c24023ae08bc495ea12e71d1c2c4ed187569d92829687da5a7de569" }, { "path": "reports/eval-pilot-20260926/unsc-bench-audit.json", "sha256": "ed1f68b8225026f2e1459777ec645e21f14ed737a0b9e26b0d22fd76b1d11d20" }, { "path": "reports/qwen35-source-plan-checkpoint-20261002.json", "sha256": "8a5f58aea39e664531562175b0d822fef711c365814eec20a2c40ac39c16f2fe" }, { "path": "explorer/catalog-summary.json", "sha256": "c8e5a735980706c9cc23d2cbbe0cb7b7f6efacb53f01679268baf38b4b61062d" }, { "path": "explorer/training-examples.json", "sha256": "88fc7c585da0d6a0988f0582ce586ad8d62d8ef2caee6ab27fd5bc900cd7ebc7" }, { "path": "explorer/decision-showcase.json", "sha256": "f0a577efa8100339f06abc4d88387f6dc76d59d0da6ddf2f5c96a41a7aaa1ee3" }, { "path": "explorer/training-samples.html", "sha256": "43c105365a197f852994d399ff963642e92b6df6560409b52d0cf2de78050f66" } ] }